Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts

Monday, September 10, 2012

Republican Paradise?

One reason most Greek-Americans will likely vote for Barack Obama – again I might add; most surveys from 2008 showed more than 60 percent of Greek-Americans voted for Obama - is the way Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and Republicans everywhere compare the Obama Administration’s spending and economic policies to the current crisis in the motherland.

“If the President gets reelected we’ll end up like Greece” they shriek (of course, many of us still think some things in Greece are worthy of emulation, but that’s another matter).

But modern Greece should look like a paradise to Republicans, especially ones like Paul Ryan who idolize Ayn Rand.

As you know, Rand’s central philosophy was that enlightened selfishness and hyper individualism was the best way to build a modern society, and she rejected collective - especially government - action and programs. 

In Rand’s idealized society, it’s every man for himself. Do not help others; they will eventually crawl their way out of the mire, or perish (either way, taxes stay low!).  Small government, anti-tax Republicans love her - even though she was an atheist.

So to the modern Republican Party, ‘Greece’ is shorthand for ‘bad’ and ‘failure’ and Rand is simply fantastic.

But the current situation in Greece is as much a failure of Ayn Rand-like thinking as it is a failure of an over-leveraged nation state.

In Greece, the political and economic elites have always operated under Rand’s central principle of every man for himself.  Consider:
 
  • Wealthy Greeks do NOT pay their taxes.  Republicans don’t want to pay taxes, so they’d love Greece.  
  • Greek elites such as judges, politicians and regulators always put themselves and their economic self-interest above all else. That’s why bribes are a way of life in Greece. Bribes are seen as a way of increasing your individual wealth rather than seen as weakening the public’s confidence in the nation state or government institutions and accountability.  I got to get mine! Who needs public confidence in the nation state anyway?  Not Republicans. Once again, for the GOP Greece should be the word. 
  • Instead of hiring legal, Greek workers, economic elites love to hire and rip off illegal aliens.  Hiring illegal aliens and paying them in cash, off the books and without receipts epitomizes enlightened selfishness. Why pay someone legally, pay taxes and fees on income, or contribute to building a Greek middle class by using union labor when I can save money by hiring (and intimidating) an illegal alien who will work for peanuts?  The bottom line is more important to Ayn Rand Republicans - and Greek business leaders - that building a middle class or certainly unions. 
Those are just 3 examples of why crisis-ridden Greece is a Republican paradise - and the main reasons why Greece is in such trouble.  Maybe the insults will stop. 

Or worse! Maybe folks like Paul Ryan will move to this unbeknown Randian paradise know as modern Greece.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Heels are back

Outside of my family nothing makes me quite as happy - most of the time - as watching (and of course blogging about) the Tar Heels. They could have been playing inside a phone booth, let alone on the deck of an aircraft carrier, and I would have watched - and enjoyed watching.

To say today's game was different than most openers is an understatement.  The president sitting court side, the court being outside on an aircraft carrier, playing on a national holiday - a holiday we usually ignore as much as we currently ignore the wars being fought in Afghanistan and Iraq - were all unique experiences, even for a team as used to the spotlight and hype as Carolina.

Those factors, especially being outside with a weird backdrop, plus the first game of the season, make it hard to really evaluate how the Heels and the Spartans (putting the Hellenic in Carolina Hellenic Blue blog) played tonight.  It was a disjointed game, without much flow. 

The good news is the Heels played very well in the last 5 minutes of the first half both on offense and defense, and especially in the first 10 minutes of the second.  The Heels got and made easy baskets, some created by their work on the board but many from their defensive pressure, some because Michigan State was sloppy.  But the Heels looked like the Heels for those 15 minutes - running and scoring and forcing the action.

The other 25 weren't that bad. There was a 10-minute stretch in the first half where the Spartans killed us on the boards, and a 5-minute one where we lost focus and allowed Michigan State to cut our 20-point lead in half.  

But the main reason it was disjointed is the Heels missed many makeable shots, including free throws, early.  The silver lining to both is that one, Carolina was getting good shots, and two, the Heels were being aggressive on offense and getting fouled.

So we can quibble with the execution, execution that may have been impacted by the weather, an outdoor court, nerves, playing in front of the president AND on the deck of a massive war machine, etc.  But Carolina generally did what Carolina wanted to do, which bodes well for when the Heels move inside, you know into a building to play basketball.  

In terms of the players, John Henson was probably our player of the game.  He finished with a near triple double - 12 points, 9 blocks, and 7 boards.  The blocks are part, a HUGE part, of his game, but tonight Henson showed off a more polished offensive game.  He was impressive. Henson also had a great post-game quote: "It was fun. My excuse was sometimes I felt like the boat moved a little bit when I shot. That's why I missed."

Harrison Barnes lead the team with 17 points, and looked calm and confident for most of the night.  His 3 late, that ended a Spartans run that cut the lead to 10, effectively ended the game.  Barnes was also active defensively versus Michigan State.

Kendall Marshall and Dexter Strickland looked good in the back court, with Marshall looking in mid-season form on a number of impressive passes to start fast breaks.  Strickland benefited from 2 of those passes on his way to 10 points.  I was disappointed to see that Strickland still occasionally shoots fading away off his back foot, but he did hit his first 3-point attempt of the season.

Tyler Zeller's inability to hit shots or grab a board early lit up the twittersphere, but he had a nice second half and picked up 3 charging calls.

Carolina's bench looked solid with nice moments from Reggie Bullock and freshmen P.J. Hairston and a very active John Michael McAdoo, who finished with 4 points, 3 boards and 1 blocked shot in 17 minutes.

Not a perfect game from the Heels in terms of execution, at least when it came to shooting early, but defensively Carolina looked good, they did not turn it over much (14 for the game, 5 believe it or not from Marshall, a stat you assume will come down), they beat a good team while facing a once-in-a-lifetime scenario, but best of all did what Carolina wanted to do - at least for 25 of the 40 minutes.


Next up for the Heels is a visit to ol' Roy's hometown to inaugurate UNC Asheville's new gym.


GO HEELS!


A few more sports notes:
  • Great to hear that Wilson Ramos has been rescued.  The Venezuelan police report that an aerial raid freed Ramos.  Can't imagine what that is like, but I assume Ramos will report early, VERY early, to spring training this year.
  • Somehow, a halftime contest that featured Brooklyn Decker, James Worthy AND Tyler Hansbrough was incredibly lame.  How on earth could that happen?
  • I have nothing to add to the sad and disgusting Penn State situation. I initially thought it was harsh to not allow Joe Paterno to coach one final game in State College.  But the more you think about it, how could Paterno tell his higher ups what he heard about a child being raped in the shower, then drop it?  Never tell the police or worst of all, never confront Sandusky? How could anyone ignore those kinds of crimes against children?  Time to clean house completely in Happy Valley.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Is it hypocrisy or irony?

Got to hand it to the Republicans in the House (and their fellow travelers running for president).

They took the House in November, mainly due to economic anxiety and concerns about unemployment (plus, they had a very motivated base that felt they had to take the country back from a foreign-born Muslim president).  

But since taking office they have spent most of their time squawking about the deficit, or in places like Wisconsin and New Jersey trying to take away collective bargaining rights from public employees - economic liabilities that do not create wealth such as teachers and fire fighters.

Complaining about the deficit is code for two things: cutting taxes for rich people, and cutting programs that help non-rich people.

And the union attack is politics plain and simple.  In the wake of the Citizens United decision that allows unlimited corporate contributions, unions and the role they play in elections - both money and people - have never more important.   You take away unions and you take away lots of power from the Democrats.  It's a reprise of the late 19th century policy to break the backs of Native American culture and resistance by wiping out the bison from the plains. 

No more food for plains Native Americans, no more Native Americans.  No more unions, fewer Democrats.  And without unions, Dems would have to raise money exclusively from the same set of economic winners who are socially liberal but fiscally more conservative.

I wonder if after March 4th, the deadline for passing a spending bill to keep the government open, the focus will return to jobs and the economy.

Besides the hypocrisy of running on jobs and governing on helping rich people pay fewer taxes, there's the irony that if you cut the size of government - local, state or federal - you put people out of work.  Government is not some machine that eats money and automatically prints reports and buys toilet paper and tanks.  People - employees, Americans - do that.  And though corporations are raking in record profits they are NOT hiring Americans (those capitalist bastards!).   

And the only way to meaningfully cut the size of government or spending is to gouge defense, or cut Medicare. Medicaid, and/or Social Security.  Everything else is window dressing, hypocrisy, irony, lying - or a cynical ploy to cut taxes and attack unions. 

The last thing the economy needs is more people out of work.  And that's the bottom line here.  Jobs are more important than deficit reduction and tax cuts.  That should be the focus of the executive and legislative branches of government in Washington and state capitals.  

Finally, one last point.  Dems in the House have done a good job of messaging on the lack of action on job creation by the new Republican Congress.  Of course, the minority party does not get much air time on the news.  I just wish Obama would stop engaging the Rs so much when they repeat their mantra on the deficit.  

How hard is it to pivot on this?  "Well, reducing the deficit is an important issue, but my number one concern is putting Americans back to work.  Therefore, I urge Republicans in Congress to work with me on getting that job done first, THEN working on cutting spending."   See how I slipped the word job in there?

Or, "The last thing we need is more folks unemployed, so I urge my colleagues in Congress to only cut programs that DO not cause lay-offs or job losses in the public sector."

See, it's easy!

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Another visit to the White House

I was fortunate to represent the Sierra Club this afternoon at the White House's unveiling of their 'America's Great Outdoors' report.  

Hard to objectively assess the event.  Though I'm a semi-cynical 48-year old it was still a genuine thrill to visit the White House and be in the same room as the President of the United States, especially this President.   

It wasn't as exciting as my last visit, when the President signed the omnibus lands bill into law and added more than 2 million acres of new public land to America's great - and protected - outdoors - but it was still a great time.

The ceremony itself was relatively short, probably 20 to 25 minutes.  But the President gave a great speech.  And for a lobbyist it was awesome; a chance to talk with senior Administration officials from all the federal land agencies, environmental grant makers, and coalition partners from conservation and environmental organizations (including my next door neighbor John Kostyack from NWF, which meant that wo residents of the 3800-block of Alton Place NW were in the White House today; that may not have been the first time that happened since many of our neighbors are reporters).

Anyway, it was a great day for a great event celebrating America's Great Outdoors, an initiative the Sierra Club has been very active in ever since it was announced in April 2010 (the link is to the report the Lands team delivered to the Obama Administration in August 2010).  

I liked the White House so much I almost left my coat in the coat check room - on purpose - so I'd have an excuse to go back tomorrow.  I tweeted that from the event and did not hear a thing from the Secret Service.  So much for the Patriot Act - "Mr. President, the tweet is coming from inside the White House!"

Carolina - Hellenic Tie In

The visit to White House is also part of a plan to win Carolina it's third national championship in seven seasons.  

As I mentioned above, the last time I visited the White House was in March 2009, one week before the Heels romped to their 5th national championship.  That summer we also went to Greece.  We also went to Greece in 2005, when Roy Williams won his first and Carolina's fourth championship.

I'm not taking any chances this year.  I went to the White House today, and Ariadne* and I are going to Greece for a 5-day visit during her spring break (and a conveniently-timed Congressional recess) in March.  So if the pattern holds and we win our 6th NCAA championship in a month don't thank Roy or Harrison Barnes or John Henson - thank this blog.

* To show Evan some love - and put a cherry on top of the Carolina-Hellenic sundae - I am taking him and his cousin Paul to the Carolina-BC game in Chapel Hill this weekend.

AmeriGO HEELS!

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Coda

Not Ed Cota.  Rather, let's end this bad era.

The last 12 to 18 months were not that great.  Many of you have heard me lament how 18 months ago, in April 2009, I was in the White House to watch President Obama sign the Omnibus Wilderness Bill into law.  A few days later Tyler Hansbrough led the Heels to their fifth NCAA championship. 

Since then we've seen Duke win a national championship and the rise of ignorance/the Tea Party, otherwise known as Rand Paul.

But that era is now over.  

And the person to lead us out of the morass is . . .  No, not Barack Obama.  I'm talking about that proud son of Ames, Iowa - Harrison Barnes.

Yes, Carolina basketball begins anew tomorrow night. After a one year bad dream (I was going to say nightmare, but we all know the roots of that word are Doherty, Latin for night, and eightandtwenty, late Saxon for mare) the transition from the Hansbrough era to the Barnes one tips off Friday night versus Lipscomb.

Funny to think how at this time last year I was optimistic about Marcus Ginyard, Ed Davis and Deon Thompson's Heels, and full of promise about Larry Drew, John Henson, and Dexter Strickland.  Funny how ancient some of those names seems now, even though Deon Thompson IS the Carolina and Hellenic Blue blog since he plays professionally in Greece. 

The 2009 National Champs could not do anything wrong, but last year's team could not do anything right: shoot, rebound, make smart decisions, beat Duke in Cameron for a fifth year in a row, etc.

But Barnes is supposed to change everything.  He's even been voted a preseason first team All-American.  Not pre-season first-team ACC freshman team - first team NATIONAL All-American.

Despite the hype around Barnes - and fellow freshmen Reggie Bullock and Kendall Marshall - I'm more apprehensive this year than I was a year ago.  Just as I thought the election of Obama meant the U.S. had finally turned the corner politically into a mature, serious, problem-solving society only to see American politics tripped up by the Tea Party,  last year's season brought back all the anxieties and nervousness of the lost years of the post-Dean era.  I thought Roy had solved that malaise - he has won two national championships in six years!  But that's what losing can do, at least watching Carolina lose can do, to a person.

Things have got to get better.  Roy, like Obama, is too good to let a lost season/election cycle happen again.  Henson, Dexter Strickland, and Tyler Zeller - who if healthy could become a monster talent this season - will be a lot better.

But just like much of Obama's success will depend on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, ol' Roy will have to rely on Larry Drew II.  Drew's numbers were decent last year, but a point guard is not a numbers position.  You've got to lead, inspire, think on your feet, and deliver when needed - like Nancy Pelosi.  I think all the good people in the world are hoping that Drew - and Reid  - get their Pelosi on in the 2011 season.

GO HEELS!

One more Tar Heel topic: how about that thrilling win IN Tallahassee against the Seminoles?!  Their 37-35 win,  Carolina's first ever at Doak Campbell Stadium, helped wash the bad-election taste from my mouth.  The Heels fought the entire game, TJ Yates had another terrific game, and Carolina even got meaningful contributions from their fourth string running back, someone named Hunter Furr (do they wear that when they hunt? Really?).

Anyway, have to give some grudging props to Butch Davis.  He has held the team together despite suspensions, injuries and investigations.  I'm torn as to what to think about the guy.  

On second thought, give the props to the players.  The football program has clearly embarrassed the university, a sin for which there is almost no penance.  But the Tar Heels football team, the players who have kept their noses clean, are competing and making the university proud.

I assume Harrison Barnes will do the same, starting tomorrow night.


Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Dark Rights

Long time between posts - partly due to the election, partly due to some kids stuff, partly due to laziness.

Still hard to fathom the election - and the prospect of Speaker John Boehner - though easy to explain the results.  The midterms were a perfect storm as a wave of stupid - right-wingers who claim that Obama is both a socialist AND a slave to Wall Street (capitalism), morons who think he's a Muslim determined to hand over the country to Islamic radicals, 'constitutionalists' who don't understand how that document relates to the Bill of Rights or that the Constitution counted slaves as 3/5ths of a person and did not recognize women's suffrage, etc. - crashed into a legitimate wave of anxiety over the economy and unemployment.

It used to be that economic anxiety benefited Democrats, especially when Ds were seen as the party of labor and the Rs the party of capital.  But this year stupid overwhelmed the economic-oriented voters, and the country is much worse for it.

As frustrating as seeing motivated Republicans win at the ballot box, the message it sends and story it tells about the current state of America - not American politics, but the nation - is even more disheartening.

Obama was swept into office just 24 months ago for two reasons: he was not George Bush, and he ran on hope.  Hope almost always wins, and was the reason I blogged 3 weeks ago that I thought the Ds would stem their losses since Americans historically rarely vote mad.

[I guess that mainly applies to voting for President.  Vote Hope every fours, vote Mad every two.]

In addition to running on hope Obama promised to DO something, and unlike the Bush Administration attack our problems instead of countries.  He pledged to: stimulate the economy; reform health care; increase regulation of Wall Street; get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan; and re-industrialize the country behind a clean, green-energy economy that would fight climate change and create jobs.  Those are six big, ambitious items to deal with if you count Iraq/Afghanistan separately, and Obama did 4 out of 6!

And of the four that apply to the vilified Nancy Pelosi, she batted a thousand (a higher batting average than her hometown world champion Giants)!

That's why that fact that Obama did what he said he was going to do, and was punished at the polls for it, is even more depressing that finding out that Boehner will soon have Pelosi's old job. Or that young and serious members of Congress like Tom Perriello and John Boccieri and Zach Space did not get reelected.

It's that the nation we've become?  We're only good at tearing things down, or being against something?  We punish a President for doing what he said he was going to do?

As noted before, the left was full of piss and vinegar when Bush was in office, at least near the end of his second term.  We got completely rolled during the rush to war in Iraq, but after the nation came to it's senses we rode quite a hot streak of stopping stuff.  We stopped drilling in the Arctic Refuge in 2005, took back Congress in 2006, increased fuel economy standards in 2007, and elected an African-American president in 2008.   And that's just a partial list.

But with the exception of increasing fuel economy, those were mainly  "anti' campaigns.

Being positive is much more difficult, and now the right is crowing over having killed a climate bill in the Senate, dethroning Speaker Pelosi, and weakening the President.

I really thought the election of Obama would mark the beginning of an aspirational era, a time to think big and get things done.  And in 2009 we did pass an omnibus lands bill that protected more than 2 million acres of public land. 

But America now seems to be in the throws of a 'no cult.'  It kind of makes sense, actually. We are a nation full of pampered, spoiled, and entitled citizens who say they want change, but then vote AGAINST it. 

People who want a huge army, great schools, Social Security, a balanced budget - AND low taxes.

Folks who believe if we cut government waste and take down the signs that say "Paid for by the American Recovery Act"  we can balance the budget.

A nation full of people who think we are the wrong track, then vote against a President who has worked to get us on the right track. A nation that has completely forgotten that we are still in Afghanistan, and still spending billions in Iraq.

The right-wing in the US is made of this dangerous melange, of the stupid, the entitled, and the hypocritical, fed by corporate money unleashed by the Supreme Court and nurtured by echo chambers like Fox News. 

If it's any consolation, these kinds of turns are cyclical and usually temporary in American history.  The Know-Nothings and the slave-owners had their moment in the sun, and lost. So did the robber barons, capitalists, prohibitionists, and the machine politicians - and they all eventually lost.  

The other silver lining is that younger voters continue to get more and more liberal, and the older voters swayed this election (uber-hypocrites since the government gives each senior money - Social Security - and health care via Medicare) will shape fewer and fewer ones in the future. 

A vivid reminder of the cyclical and stupid nature of American politics could be found in Sunday's The Washington Post special section on the 150th anniversary of start of the Civil War.  Philip Kennicott concludes his essay:

... the Civil War legitimized something essential, and dark, that remains with us. Ultimately, the South was fighting for the right to be wrong, for the right to retain (and expand) something ugly and indefensible. It lost the war, and slavery was abolished. But the right to be wrong, the right to resist the progress of freedom, the right to say "no, thank you" to modernity, to leave the fences in disrepair and retreat into a world of private conviction, remains as much a part of the American character as the blood spilled to preserve the Union. Nothing great has been accomplished in America since the Civil War -- not footsteps on the moon, or women's suffrage, or the right (if not the reality) of equal, unsegregated education -- without people also passionately fighting for that dark right, too. 

Last week the forces who fight for those 'dark rights' won a temporary victory, as temporary as Bull Run or Fredericksburg. We need to remember that last Tuesday was a terrible battle for us, but liberals and other non-morons need to keep fighting.  That's the only way to win.

Greek elections
A  year after Obama was elected, Greeks went to the polls and elected a real socialist, George Papandreou, as prime minister.  Papandreou inherited an even bigger mess than Obama did, and passed drastic - and overdue - cuts to government programs, pensions, and subsidies. The Greek parliament also increased the retirement age from 54 to 65, and raised most taxes.  All these changes prompted massive and violent street protests that embarrassed Papandreou - and clear-thinking Greeks around the globe.  More tragically, 3 citizens were killed when anarchists fire bombed a bank.
 
On Sunday, Greece held their own version of mid-terms in the form of regional elections.  Despite the street protests and wining of the last year, Papadreou's Panhellenic Socialist Movement won seven of the 13 districts and regions (roughly the same as a US state) nation wide.  

Like Obama, Papandreou has been doing things, and making tough decisions that are in the national interest.  But unlike Obama, Papandreou was not punished for taking action. 

That's how bad things have gotten: Greek voters are now more mature and sober than the tea party-sotted louts who made John Boehner Speaker of the House two weeks ago.

With their 3,000 years of history, perhaps Greeks have learned something that a younger and more dynamic nation has yet to learn: that 'dark rights' are not worth fighting for.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Everyone's Got a Plan . . .


Until they get punched in the mouth.

That quote from my favorite contemporary philosopher, Mike Tyson, sums up the Obama Administration - at least since the special election of Scott Brown.

It's hard not to be too cynical about the way the White House has governed lately.  Any time they get hit in the mouth they seemingly give up. That is a bit harsh since they did get health care over the finish line and passed some pretty meaningful financial reform legislation this summer.  

But even those victories display a certain lack of fight. There was no public option in the health care bill, let alone a single-payer system.  And on financial reform there is still chance for the White House to blow it by NOT naming someone like Elizabeth Warren to lead the new consumer advocacy board.

The state of contemporary politics is neatly summed up on page 2 of today’s “Week in Review” of The New York Times. 

Actually the entire section is pretty good, but especially the quote from Al Sharpton in the article about Shirley Sherrod.  Sharpton laments the Administration getting spooked by the Tea Party and ‘arguing with people carrying signs.”

But as this editorial cartoon points out, the Obama White House is spending too little time inspiring and activating the coalition of liberals, minorities and young people who elected him, and way too much time fretting and hand wringing about what the crack pots on Fox News are saying.

“Yes We Can” has been replaced with ‘Maybe We Shouldn’t.’

And I’m not quoting the Tea Party.  That’s from the White House.







Sunday, January 31, 2010

State of the Union and bipartisanship

It looks like less than a week after Obama - once again - reached across the aisle and offered to work with Republicans bipartisanship is dead for 2010.


This Mike Luckovich cartoon (editorial cartoonists are geniuses in my opinion) says it all.  And it reminds me that bipartisanism didn't even last until the end of Obama's State of the Union speech, let alone the end of the week.


A couple of issues highlight the Republicans' unwillingness to do anything other than say no.


One, Senate Democrats are quite willing to add money for nukes and some (limited) new off shore drilling in the climate bill in order to get bipartisan support for finally placing a cap - and price - on carbon.  That's generally how Washington works; each side gives a little, and in placing nukes and new drilling on the table, Dems are giving up a lot.  


Those measures should be enough to keep lame Dems like Ben Nelson and even Mary Landrieu happy.  And if they were ideologically consistent, new drilling and money for nukes should also get Rs like John McCain, Lamar Alexander, George Voinovich, George Lemieux, and Richard Lugar to vote with Democrats and pass a climate bill.  However, Senate Republicans are already saying they will vote against the climate bill even if it contains two of their energy priorities in it.  


But as you know, and as the cartoon and other columns in today's Sunday papers point out, Republicans aren't about legislating or meeting challenges.  Their only issue is saying no to Obama, and hoping he and the country fails.


Issue two is believe it not jobs.  Obama said he wanted a jobs bill, the public wants federal action on jobs, and bottom line who is against JOBS!  JOBS!  That used to be something we could agree on (other no brainers: the need for oxygen, stemming uncontrolled bleeding, taking medicine when sick, and saying 'you're welcome' after someone says 'thank you.').  Once again Senate Republicans and unstatesmen like Ben Nelson are to blame, saying deficit reduction is more important than spending money to promote jobs or provide tax incentives to promote new hiring.


It used to be that patriotism was the last refuge of scoundrels.  It's now the second to the last, after saying 'we need to reduce the deficit.'


Ninety-seven percent of federal spending is on defense, social security/medicare/medicaid, and interest on the debt.  Only 3 percent of federal spending is discretionary - done by Congress - for roads, parks, the arts, higher education, and everyone's favorite boogeyman, ear marks.  You can never significantly reduce the deficit by cutting discretionary spending.  That doesn't stop the scoundrels who say the deficit is more important than jobs from leading folks to believe that cutting waste in welfare or the other social services is the way to go.  They are not telling the truth.  If they were serious about reducing our debt they would either 1) cut defense and into the safety net, both politically unrealistic, or 2) dramatically increase revenue.


One way to do that is to substantially raise taxes, or bring in more revenue from increased economic activity like you know, more jobs. 


Three, I rarely quote Jimmy Kimmel but he summed up the State of the Union when he said 'Republicans pointed out that Obama has repeatedly failed to solve any of the problems they created under President Bush.'


On to bipartisanship!

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

I take it all back

I guess 2009 really did stink.  One year after giddily watching Obama take office it's hard not to be depressed about the way things have regressed in American politics.


There are many ways to explain the Republican win in Massachusetts tonight; arrogance by Coakley, who did not campaign for weeks after winning the Democratic primary to fill Ted Kennedy's seat; anger at the Democratic machine in Massachusetts, where Republicans have won elections for governor arguing that the Bay State needs to be a two-party state; finally, there was a consensus that Coakley was a pretty bad candidate and not nearly as charismatic as Brown.


One ironic aside.  For years, Rs complained that Ted Kennedy was an immoral and godless liberal.  Well, they just elected a dude who posed nude for a women's magazine.


But the details don't matter.  The Massachusetts Senate election will hurt Obama - and health care.  Short term, House Dems will likely pass the weaker Senate health care bill.  Long term, and by that I mean between now and November 2010, who knows how things will play out.


There is sincere anger with Obama from the left for keeping troops in Afghanistan and for not being more of a liberal.  Of course, the president gets it from both sides; the Rs think he has gone too far, though there is no proof of that at all.


I agree with Frank Rich, that the Rs are fighting so hard because they understand the country is demographically changing, and their brand is fading.  Wins like the one in Massachusetts may bolster R hopes for now, but I still think the arc of history should bend towards the Democrats.  Ideally, the Massachusetts election will remind Dems that Obama swept into office from the left.


But for the Dems to succeed in capitalizing on the demographics tilting the American electorate to the left, they will have to stand up to the Rs, tea baggers, Glen Beck, etc. and defend liberalism. Sadly, unless Paul Wellstone gets resurrected, it's hard to see that happening.


However, there is one person capable of doing that, and luckily that person is President Obama.  Let's hope this gets him more fired up and back in campaign mode.  The other good news is that the Republicans still a) have no message besides that they don't like the president; it's hard to win elections without a positive message; and b) their bench is incredibly weak, so the Dems will be running against crazies in some cases this fall.  And as Coakley found out, a weak candidate can undo huge advantages.


Finally, if employment catches up to the economy this summer and fall, fickle Americans will stop being so mad - and perhaps independents will start thinking for themselves - and reward the President for a fixing the economy.


Anyway, this is my snap assessment of the Massachusetts vote.  I'll revisit this Wednesday night to see if I made any sense.


One last word on independents.  Can we start calling them what they really are, which worst case is stupid and best case is a dilettante.  It seems to me that an independent is someone who doesn't follow politics but thinks their disengagement from the process and civic life gives them some kind of clarity of thought.  


When in truth, the opposite is true.  Since they have no core Republican or Democrat values, and they are not paying attention, they fall for the loudest or most charismatic voice.  I'm sure Obama capitalized from this in November, when his energy and vision combined with deep-seeded anger with George W. Bush to carry independents.  But it's also why 12 months later those same independents voted in a knee-jerk reaction for Brown in Massachusetts, and why others tell pollsters they are unhappy with the president.  They see the tea baggers complaining about big government and liberals so they go along.  


Like Homer Simpson (sorry for the insult Homer), there is literally nothing in their heads, no ideology or values - outside of a love for doughnuts and shitty beer - so they go with the loudest and last voice they hear.  Instead of stupid or dilettante I guess DEpendent is more appropriate.  But they are NOT independent.

Thursday, December 31, 2009

2009

There seems to be a consensus that 2009 was not that great of a year.  There are obvious things to point at: a struggling economy that had ripple effects from Wall St. to Main St. to the coffers of the Sierra Club; two wars that are still dragging the U.S. down in the muck; and terrorism still a major concern thanks mainly to all the great recruitment efforts initiated by George Bush.


But I feel compelled to rise to the defense 2009.  Most of that argument will come from my narrow self interested point of view, but not all of it.


First and foremost, we saw Barack Obama become president of the United States.  From electing the first African-American president, to Americans choosing serious grown-ups interested in governing over ideologues primarily concerned with wedge politics who think wars are easy, Obama's 2009 inauguration should not be taken for granted.


Remember, Obama's only been in office less than a year; in the run up to the election folks like Frank Rich opined that by the end of the summer, months before the actual election, many Americans acted - and reacted - as if Obama was already president.  I wonder if that sentiment it to blame for some of the impatience many on the left feel for the president.


Like many leftists, I'm not happy about his decision to stay in Afghanistan until 2011 or the final shape of the Senate health care bill (as most of you know, I support a single-payer, Medicare-for-all style plan or at least all kids 0-6 and folks above 55).  


However, as I blogged last month, the Obama Administration is poised for a good year. Hiring will pick up next year, Guantanamo will be shut down, and Congress will have passed both a health care bill and a climate and energy bill. Best of all, grown ups will be making these decisions.  


Finally, 2009 was not all bad politically.  Congress passed a stimulus bill that though too small, did stabilize the economy and has it poised for a come back in 2010.  Congress passed and the president signed a wilderness bill that protects more than 2 millions acres of public land.  Obama initiatives on clean cars and regulating global warming pollution will pay huge dividends.  And the House passed bills on climate change, financial reform and health care.


The fact that grown ups are in charge in the White House also gives me optimism about fighting terrorism, air line security, etc. (I would love Rs to try to run on national security; if they do it gives Ds a chance to talk about Bush again and what the previous administration did; do Rs really want voters thinking about Bush as they go to the polls in 2010?). 


Perhaps I am giving the administration too much credit, but I think there are real reasons to have faith in the Obama White House.


Now, on to my narrow self interest.  A little more than a year ago, prior to the election, I remember feeling a great deal of anxiety.  The election, the chants of 'drill baby drill' ringing in my head (and the demise of the drilling moratorium), and Ariadne graduating from Aidan and applying to new schools were the three main causes of that anxiety.  Oh, and Tyler Hansbrough was hurt.


But man, things turned out pretty well.
  • Ariadne did well on her admissions tests, was accepted at all three of the schools she applied to, and has had a fantastic first trimester at Edmund Burke School;
  • Obama won, and inauguration day was incredibly inspiring and fun;
  • We finally passed the wilderness bill after almost 18 months of work, and I got to go to the White House for the signing ceremony;
  • Evan made the jump to the majors division of Little League, and held his own against 13-year old pitchers;
  • Evan also won the AHEPA award for best student in the St. Sophia Greek School;
  • Carolina won it's 5th NCAA basketball championship behind perhaps the greatest Tar Heel of all time;
  • The women's soccer team continued its unequaled dynasty with another championship;
  • We went to Greece this summer;
  • The Nats signed Stephen Strasbourg;
  • Greece and the U.S. qualified for the 2010 World Cup;
That's a pretty good list heading into 2010, a year that frankly may have trouble matching up a 12 months from now.  


Then again, Ds gaining seats in Congress in the 2010 midterm elections, unemployment going down to 5-7 percent, and wars ending probably outweighs winning a national championship.  When all that comes to pass remember the groundwork was laid in 2009.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Give It Up For Harry Reid

Got to give it up for Harry Reid.  Holding all 60 Democrats - from Landrieu to Lincoln to Ben Nelson to Specter - on a cloture vote was HUGE, and reminiscent of LBJ's work passing civil rights bills in the late 50s and early 60s.  At least 3 of those Senators continue to voice opposition to an expanded role for government in health care.  Ironic on a number of levels, since all Senators receive excellent, government-run health care, and at least Nelson and Specter qualify for government-run Medicare.  


Nicholas Kristoff recently described how successful Medicare is:  . . . there is one American health statistic that is strikingly above average: life expectancy for Americans who have already reached the age of 65. At that point, they can expect to live longer than the average in industrialized countries. That’s because Americans above age 65 actually have universal health care coverage: Medicare. 


But it's not Kristoff's column that prompted me to blog about Harry Reid.  Instead, it was a piece on NPR about Orson Welles.  


Welles became famous when on Halloween his radio play of 'War of the Worlds' convinced some people that our planet (the number ONE planet in our solar system) was actually under attack from aliens from outer space.   


I hadn't really thought about that incident much,  but did today in that it reminded me that we have always had some really stupid people in America. It may be too harsh to declare folks fooled by that radio play stupid, and for all I know the percentage of people fooled was probably very small.  


The WOTWs panic made me think that people now are much smarter, or at least more sophisticated, and that type of thing could never happen now. Then again, lots of people think Obama is a fascist and will give the country to the Muslims, etc.


So while we've always had stupid and unsophisticated people in America, I think one difference is back then that crowd was isolated and shunned. Today, they flock to Tea Bag Rallies and wait in line to buy Sarah Palin's book.  From time to time someone like Father Coughlin or the John Birch Society would become prominent, but they always lost. The New Deal and then the Great Society programs were passed by Congress and shaped American life over their opposition.


That crowd still loses, at least lost in 2006 and 2008 (and 1992, 1996 and got the fewest votes in 2000).  But with the explosion of media - cable television, the 24-hour news cycle, the internet (even blogs) - that crowd is not shunned, it's celebrated or at least used to fill up space and time on the air.  


Finally, I think the mainstream media used to actively shun racists, people who did not believe in evolution, etc. and exercised editorial authority by excluding crack pots.  But now the media is less interested in reporting hard truths or science, and instead feels that it's job is to report both sides even if one side is wrong or just plain nuts.  I wonder if activists who compare Obama to Hitler or want to  keep the government out of Medicare would have made it on the air 20 or 30 years ago.  


[To be fair to the mainstream media, very few allowed the birth certificate nut jobs any air time, for instance.]


It's a perfect storm of the 24-hour news cycle, the current version of inclusive American democracy, and Andy Warhol:  no matter how fringy or crazy or wrong, EVERY point of view gets it's 15 minutes of fame.


So kudos to Harry Reid for getting 60 votes to end the debate on health care despite the cacophony that passes for our democracy these days.





Saturday, October 10, 2009

Happy Indigenous Peoples Day Weekend!

A good weekend of baseball is pending if the games of the last 4 days are any indication of things to come.

I didn't enjoy watching the Yankees win tonight, but that was a fun and frustrating game to watch. The Twins had multiple chances - 17 left on base including the bases loaded in the 11th - plus Joe Nathan pitching with a two-run lead. That game was theirs to win and they blew it.

Not sure what was worse, watching A-Rod get the big hit or watching the umpire miss Mauer's double in the 11th, a play that was right in front of the guys face. How do you a blow a call like that? Not only did the ball clearly land in fair territory, he had to see it nick Cabrera's glove, too. The umpire blew that call TWICE!

The Yankees comeback mimicked the Dodgers' win from the night before. I've never liked Matt Holiday, and conversely I've always loved me some Ronnie Belliard. It was good to see an ex-Nat excel, and I am firmly on the Dodgers Bandwagon.

As exciting as this round of baseball has been I still have misgivings about the wild card and the extra round of playoffs, something Boswell covered in his column today. I'd still vote to get rid of the wild card and go back to two divisions, east and west, and only have 4 teams make the playoffs.

FOOTBALL UPDATE

Greece tries to salvage their 2010 World Cup qualifying campaign when they host the 'Fighting Baltics' from Latvia tomorrow. Ellas needs to win its last two games and hope that Switzerland stumbles against Israel and/or Luxembourg to win their group and qualify. But it looks more likely that Greece will have to win a playoff among other European teams that finish second in their group.

However, they have to finish second. If Greece loses tomorrow at home versus Latvia finishing second is impossible.

Carolina plays another Division I-AA squad tomorrow in Chapel Hill when they host Georgia Southern. It's an important chance for the offense and especially the offensive line to get their act together and salvage the season. After GS, the Tar Heels play back-to-back Thursday night games, at home versus FSU and at Virginia Tech. Winning those two games - a split is more likely - would definitely turn things around and erase the memory of the horrible loss to Virginia last Saturday.

PRESIDENTIAL NEWS

Greece elected another Papandreou last weekend when the socialist PASOK party swept election there. I like the new PM, who like me was born in the United States and speaks Greek with an American accent.

And I now consider myself a candidate for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize, since both Barack Obama and I have solved the same number of international crises. But I'm happy for Obama, who I assume won due to multiple reasons: fixing America's international image, NOT being George Bush, reenergizing the world's most important democracy and attracting new voters, announcing his intention to close Guantanemo and getting us out of Iraq (and ignoring the ratcheting up in Afghanistan). I also wonder if the Nobel Committee wanted to stick their finger in the eye of the International Olympic Committee.

It's also funny to see the Rs go nuts complaining. As Bill Maher said on tonight's show, giving Obama the peace prize is the trifecta for the right wing since they hate black people, foreigners, and peace.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Border States vs. the Deep South

I want to remind folks that the Tar Heel State, along with fellow border states - Arkansas and Tennessee, plus Florida, which was unsuited for large, export crop plantations - had FAR fewer slaves. And by border, I'm referring to the Confederacy. The legacy of slavery continues to shape southern politics TODAY, much like it did in 1860s.


But the deep south - Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina - is different and much more conservative, closed minded, and racist.


In Louisiana, prostitute client David Vitter is basing his reelection on opposing Obama. The foundation of that opposition is race, plain and simple.


In Mississippi, a statewide referendum to remove the Confederate flag from the state flag's design failed overwhelmingly, with the vote totals mirroring the racial profile of registered voters.


Of course, in South Carolina the Confederate flag flies on the state house grounds in Columbia. The NAACP continues a travel boycott of South Carolina over the flag issue.


In 2002, Georgia voters did not reelect a Democratic governor and Senator Max Cleland. The number one issue for voters, according to exit polls, was the decision by the previous Democratic governor to remove the Confederate flag motif from the state flag.


Only 14 percent of white Louisianans voted for Obama last year. In Alabama, Obama picked up even fewer white votes, only 10 percent. For Mississippi, 11 percent.


In fairness (and obviously painting with such a broad brush - especially on a topic like this - is not accurate but it IS ranty) more than 20 percent of white voters in Georgia and South Carolina (26% and 23%, respectively) voted for Obama.


But in the historically more moderate border states Obama picked up more than 30% of the white vote: North Carolina 35%; Arkansas 30%; Tennessee 34%.


As William Faulkner said, a man who you have to give the benefit of the doubt, 'The past is not dead. In fact, it's not even past' is sadly still true when it comes to politics in the deep south.