I'm not talking about the NBA Finals, which features two unlikable teams. How unlikable is the Celtics franchise? Even with Ra playing a prominent role I STILL can't root for the Cs.
But can I really root 'for' the Lakers? No.
James Worthy played for the Lakers, so I guess I'd rather see the Cs lose.
But my summer will be spent following our resurgent Nats - with Steven Strasburg in town next week - and the World Cup - with my two favorite countries playing.
Nats Notes
How nice to have a real baseball team. A 26-26 record one-third of the way into the season is cause for celebration enough, even better with Strasburg on the horizon.
For comparison, the Nats were 26-61 last year. 61 losses!
The irony of Strasburg charging up this season is that the Nats' pitching has been pretty good. Livan Hernandez has been rejuvenated, John Lannan and Scott Olson (though his is currently fighting off shoulder problems) have turned their seasons around, and unheralded Luis Atalano has been above average. Strasburg will likely take Craig Stammen's place, giving the Nats a pretty impressive starting rotation.
The bullpen, at least Burnett, Clippard and especially Matt Capps, has been excellent.
The Nats' offense and defense have been bigger issues. The middle of the order has been solid offensively, but Nyjer Morgan has been pretty weak at the top of the order, and has been equally bad in the field of late.
Manager Jim Riggleman dropped Morgan to second last night - with Guzman leading off - and the Nationals scored 14 runs, so maybe the batting order reordering will get the offense on track.
But I'm not crazy about either of those guys, neither of whom walk much, at the top of the order. Instead of just flip flopping Guzman and Morgan, I'd move rookies Roger Bernandina and Ian Desmond to the top of the order and see how that works.
Finally, look for the Nats to go on a few more mini-winning streaks once Ivan Rodriguez returns from the DL. As great as Strasburg's arrival will be, getting Pudge back will probably be a bigger deal in the won-loss column.
A few more Nats notes:
- I like the Nats' radio guys a lot. Both Charlie Sloss and Dave Jaegler do a nice job. On TV, Rob Dibble is not good; he doesn't do his homework and talks about himself a lot. Rob Carpenter is a competent play-by-play man. He's a little clichéd, but did make a surprising Simpsons reference the other night.
- The dude I love listening to is Ray Knight. He mainly does the pre- and post-game shows, but when he's in the booth as the color man he's excellent. He doesn't hold back on the praise or the criticism.
- One snarky comment: Manny Acta, who led the Nats to their 26-61 mark last year, is currently managing the Indians to a 19-31 record. So he's 45 and 92 in the last two seasons, a year after a 102-loss season for the Nats. He must be really charming in the interview.
World Cup Fever
I'm surprisingly geeked up about the pending World Cup. Maybe it's the fact that both the US and Greece are in, the spectacle, the event being in Africa, or the cool Bono-narrated ads, but either way I'm excited.
Both America and Ellas should advance out their group. We have a very doable and exciting group. The US kicks off with a potentially intriguing match versus England. If we can hang with Knights of St. George it should give the US squad quite a bit of confidence. But no matter what happens versus England the US should handle Slovenia and Algeria, and advance to the round of 16.
Greece has a tougher group, with Argentina the favorite. Greece has been pretty uninspiring since running the table and winning the 2004 European Championship in one of the biggest upsets in sports. Greece will get outclassed by Argentina, but I bet Ellas will defeat both Nigeria and South Korea (or at least win one and tie one) to advance out of their group.
Neither of those nations play an attacking style of football, so look for Greece's defense to keep both Nigeria and South Korea from scoring. Conversely, as we did in 2004, Greece will do enough from set pieces to win/ties, and pick up 4 to 6 points and advance.
One cynical note. Having the World Cup in Africa, especially South Africa, is a tribute to Nelson Mandela. And holding the event in Africa for the first time is also recognition that the continent is making strides towards stability and progress.
But is it really a celebration of Africa when the World Cup is held in one of the two countries that used to be ruled, and an infrastructure built, by a racist, apartheid regime? On the other hand, South Africa has faired much, much better since majority rule was established than Zimbabwe has, a testament to the confident, wise, and strong leadership of Mandela.
However, an event like the World Cup will truly be a celebration for Africa if it's held in Addis Ababa (my favorite since Ethiopia is the only African nation never to be have colonized by Europeans) or Abidjan (home of Didier Drogba and probably the most prosperous city in west Africa) or Lagos (largest city in what should be the wealthiest country in west Africa) - or Harare - rather than South Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment